Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Suzuki Swift
Spec diff in New Zealand. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is 850 mm longer than Suzuki Swift.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is 1116 kg heavier than Suzuki Swift.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV offers 230 L more boot space (seats up) than Suzuki Swift.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses 2.7 L/100km less fuel than Suzuki Swift.
At a glance
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEVSuzuki Swift
Length
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV4710 mm
Suzuki Swift3860 mm
Cargo (seats up)
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV495 L
Suzuki Swift265 L
Kerb weight
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV2100 kg
Suzuki Swift984 kg
| Spec | Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV | Suzuki Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4710 mm | 3860 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1862 mm | 1735 mm✓ |
| Height | 1745 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2706 mm | 2450 mm |
| Ground clearance | 203 mm | 115 mm |
| Turning circle | — | 4.8 m |
| Cargo (seats up) | 495 L✓ | 265 L |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1394 L✓ | 589 L |
| Kerb weight | 2100 kg | 984 kg✓ |
| Towing (braked) | 1600 kg | — |
| Towing (unbraked) | 750 kg | — |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Range (WLTP) | 84 km | — |
| AC charging (max) | 7 kW | — |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 1.6 L/100km✓ | 4.3 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | — | 37 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).