MG ZS EV vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Spec diff in New Zealand. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is 387 mm longer than MG ZS EV.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is 480 kg heavier than MG ZS EV.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV offers 47 L more boot space (seats up) than MG ZS EV.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV tows 1100 kg more (braked) than MG ZS EV.
At a glance
MG ZS EVMitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Length
MG ZS EV4323 mm
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV4710 mm
Cargo (seats up)
MG ZS EV448 L
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV495 L
Kerb weight
MG ZS EV1620 kg
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV2100 kg
Towing (braked)
MG ZS EV500 kg
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV1600 kg
Range
MG ZS EV440 km
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV84 km
| Spec | MG ZS EV | Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4323 mm✓ | 4710 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1809 mm✓ | 1862 mm |
| Height | 1649 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2581 mm | 2706 mm |
| Ground clearance | — | 203 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.2 m | — |
| Cargo (seats up) | 448 L | 495 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1166 L | 1394 L✓ |
| Kerb weight | 1620 kg✓ | 2100 kg |
| Towing (braked) | 500 kg | 1600 kg✓ |
| Towing (unbraked) | — | 750 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Battery (usable) | 68.3 kWh | — |
| Range (WLTP) | 440 km✓ | 84 km |
| AC charging (max) | 7 kW | 7 kW |
| DC charging peak | 94 kW | — |
| DC 10–80% time | 37 min | — |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 1.6 L/100km |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).