Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Rogue
Spec diff in Canada. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Nissan Rogue is 76 mm longer than Mazda CX-5.
- • Mazda CX-5 is 3 kg heavier than Nissan Rogue.
- • Nissan Rogue offers 153 L more boot space (seats up) than Mazda CX-5.
- • Nissan Rogue uses 1.3 L/100km less fuel than Mazda CX-5.
At a glance
Mazda CX-5Nissan Rogue
Length
Mazda CX-54575 mm
Nissan Rogue4651 mm
Cargo (seats up)
Mazda CX-5875 L
Nissan Rogue1028 L
Kerb weight
Mazda CX-51623 kg
Nissan Rogue1620 kg
| Spec | Mazda CX-5 | Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4575 mm✓ | 4651 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1845 mm | 1840 mm✓ |
| Height | 1680 mm | 1701 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2700 mm | 2706 mm |
| Ground clearance | 193 mm | 218 mm |
| Cargo (seats up) | 875 L | 1028 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1687 L | 2064 L✓ |
| Kerb weight | 1623 kg | 1620 kg✓ |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 9.0 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km✓ |
| Fuel tank | 58 L✓ | 53 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).