Chevrolet Equinox vs Mazda CX-5
Spec diff in Canada. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Chevrolet Equinox is 144 mm longer than Mazda CX-5.
- • Chevrolet Equinox is 52 kg heavier than Mazda CX-5.
- • Mazda CX-5 offers 2 L more boot space (seats up) than Chevrolet Equinox.
- • Chevrolet Equinox uses 0.3 L/100km less fuel than Mazda CX-5.
At a glance
Chevrolet EquinoxMazda CX-5
Length
Chevrolet Equinox4719 mm
Mazda CX-54575 mm
Cargo (seats up)
Chevrolet Equinox873 L
Mazda CX-5875 L
Kerb weight
Chevrolet Equinox1675 kg
Mazda CX-51623 kg
| Spec | Chevrolet Equinox | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4719 mm | 4575 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1844 mm✓ | 1845 mm |
| Height | 1682 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2745 mm | 2700 mm |
| Ground clearance | 200 mm | 193 mm |
| Cargo (seats up) | 873 L | 875 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1815 L✓ | 1687 L |
| Kerb weight | 1675 kg | 1623 kg✓ |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 8.7 L/100km✓ | 9.0 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 55 L | 58 L✓ |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).