Nissan X-Trail vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Toyota LandCruiser 300 is 300 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Toyota LandCruiser 300 is 989 kg heavier than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Nissan X-Trail uses 1.5 L/100km less fuel than Toyota LandCruiser 300.
At a glance
Nissan X-TrailToyota LandCruiser 300
Length
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Toyota LandCruiser 3004980 mm
Kerb weight
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
Toyota LandCruiser 3002620 kg
| Spec | Nissan X-Trail | Toyota LandCruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4680 mm✓ | 4980 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1840 mm✓ | 1980 mm |
| Height | 1725 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2705 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground clearance | 205 mm | 235 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.2 m✓ | 11.8 m |
| Cargo (seats up) | 575 L | — |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1424 L | — |
| Kerb weight | 1631 kg✓ | 2620 kg |
| Payload | — | 660 kg |
| Towing (braked) | — | 3500 kg |
| Towing (unbraked) | — | 750 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 7.4 L/100km✓ | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 55 L | 110 L✓ |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).