BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Nissan X-Trail is 225 mm longer than BYD Atto 3.
- • BYD Atto 3 is 119 kg heavier than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Nissan X-Trail offers 135 L more boot space (seats up) than BYD Atto 3.
At a glance
BYD Atto 3Nissan X-Trail
Length
BYD Atto 34455 mm
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Cargo (seats up)
BYD Atto 3440 L
Nissan X-Trail575 L
Kerb weight
BYD Atto 31750 kg
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
| Spec | BYD Atto 3 | Nissan X-Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4455 mm✓ | 4680 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1875 mm | 1840 mm✓ |
| Height | 1615 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2720 mm | 2705 mm |
| Ground clearance | 175 mm | 205 mm |
| Turning circle | 11 m✓ | 11.2 m |
| Cargo (seats up) | 440 L | 575 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1340 L | 1424 L✓ |
| Kerb weight | 1750 kg | 1631 kg✓ |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Range (WLTP) | 420 km | — |
| AC charging (max) | 7 kW | — |
| DC charging peak | 88 kW | — |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | — | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).