Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Mitsubishi Triton is 340 mm longer than Toyota LandCruiser 300.
- • Toyota LandCruiser 300 is 456 kg heavier than Mitsubishi Triton.
- • Mitsubishi Triton uses 1.2 L/100km less fuel than Toyota LandCruiser 300.
At a glance
Mitsubishi TritonToyota LandCruiser 300
Length
Mitsubishi Triton5320 mm
Toyota LandCruiser 3004980 mm
Kerb weight
Mitsubishi Triton2164 kg
Toyota LandCruiser 3002620 kg
Towing (braked)
Mitsubishi Triton3500 kg
Toyota LandCruiser 3003500 kg
| Spec | Mitsubishi Triton | Toyota LandCruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5320 mm | 4980 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1930 mm✓ | 1980 mm |
| Height | 1795 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3130 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground clearance | 228 mm | 235 mm |
| Turning circle | — | 11.8 m |
| Kerb weight | 2164 kg✓ | 2620 kg |
| Payload | 1036 kg✓ | 660 kg |
| Towing (braked) | 3500 kg | 3500 kg |
| Towing (unbraked) | 750 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 7.7 L/100km✓ | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 75 L | 110 L✓ |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).