BYD Shark 6 vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • BYD Shark 6 is 137 mm longer than Mitsubishi Triton.
- • BYD Shark 6 is 546 kg heavier than Mitsubishi Triton.
At a glance
BYD Shark 6Mitsubishi Triton
Length
BYD Shark 65457 mm
Mitsubishi Triton5320 mm
Kerb weight
BYD Shark 62710 kg
Mitsubishi Triton2164 kg
| Spec | BYD Shark 6 | Mitsubishi Triton |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5457 mm | 5320 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1971 mm | 1930 mm✓ |
| Height | 1925 mm | 1795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3260 mm | 3130 mm |
| Ground clearance | 230 mm | 228 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.6 m | — |
| Kerb weight | 2710 kg | 2164 kg✓ |
| Payload | 790 kg | 1036 kg✓ |
| Towing (braked) | — | 3500 kg |
| Towing (unbraked) | — | 750 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Range (WLTP) | 100 km | — |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 60 L | 75 L✓ |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).