Mitsubishi Triton vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Mitsubishi Triton is 640 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Mitsubishi Triton is 533 kg heavier than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Nissan X-Trail uses 0.3 L/100km less fuel than Mitsubishi Triton.
At a glance
Mitsubishi TritonNissan X-Trail
Length
Mitsubishi Triton5320 mm
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Kerb weight
Mitsubishi Triton2164 kg
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
| Spec | Mitsubishi Triton | Nissan X-Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5320 mm | 4680 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1930 mm | 1840 mm✓ |
| Height | 1795 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3130 mm | 2705 mm |
| Ground clearance | 228 mm | 205 mm |
| Turning circle | — | 11.2 m |
| Cargo (seats up) | — | 575 L |
| Cargo (seats folded) | — | 1424 L |
| Kerb weight | 2164 kg | 1631 kg✓ |
| Payload | 1036 kg | — |
| Towing (braked) | 3500 kg | — |
| Towing (unbraked) | 750 kg | — |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 7.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km✓ |
| Fuel tank | 75 L✓ | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).