Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Spec diff in New Zealand. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Ford Ranger is 660 mm longer than Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
- • Ford Ranger is 150 kg heavier than Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
- • Ford Ranger tows 1900 kg more (braked) than Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses 5.6 L/100km less fuel than Ford Ranger.
At a glance
Ford RangerMitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Length
Ford Ranger5370 mm
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV4710 mm
Kerb weight
Ford Ranger2250 kg
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV2100 kg
Towing (braked)
Ford Ranger3500 kg
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV1600 kg
| Spec | Ford Ranger | Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5370 mm | 4710 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1918 mm | 1862 mm✓ |
| Height | 1884 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3270 mm | 2706 mm |
| Ground clearance | 234 mm | 203 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.9 m | — |
| Cargo (seats up) | — | 495 L |
| Cargo (seats folded) | — | 1394 L |
| Kerb weight | 2250 kg | 2100 kg✓ |
| Payload | 980 kg | — |
| Towing (braked) | 3500 kg✓ | 1600 kg |
| Towing (unbraked) | 750 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Range (WLTP) | — | 84 km |
| AC charging (max) | — | 7 kW |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 7.2 L/100km | 1.6 L/100km✓ |
| Fuel tank | 80 L | — |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).