Jeep Wrangler vs Mazda CX-5
Spec diff in Canada. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Jeep Wrangler is 307 mm longer than Mazda CX-5.
- • Jeep Wrangler is 305 kg heavier than Mazda CX-5.
- • Jeep Wrangler offers 23 L more boot space (seats up) than Mazda CX-5.
- • Mazda CX-5 uses 3.0 L/100km less fuel than Jeep Wrangler.
At a glance
Jeep WranglerMazda CX-5
Length
Jeep Wrangler4882 mm
Mazda CX-54575 mm
Cargo (seats up)
Jeep Wrangler898 L
Mazda CX-5875 L
Kerb weight
Jeep Wrangler1928 kg
Mazda CX-51623 kg
| Spec | Jeep Wrangler | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4882 mm | 4575 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1894 mm | 1845 mm✓ |
| Height | 1839 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3008 mm | 2700 mm |
| Ground clearance | 251 mm | 193 mm |
| Cargo (seats up) | 898 L✓ | 875 L |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 2050 L✓ | 1687 L |
| Kerb weight | 1928 kg | 1623 kg✓ |
| Towing (braked) | 1588 kg | — |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 12.0 L/100km | 9.0 L/100km✓ |
| Fuel tank | 81 L✓ | 58 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).