MG ZS vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Nissan X-Trail is 250 mm longer than MG ZS.
- • Nissan X-Trail is 221 kg heavier than MG ZS.
- • Nissan X-Trail offers 132 L more boot space (seats up) than MG ZS.
At a glance
MG ZSNissan X-Trail
Length
MG ZS4430 mm
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Cargo (seats up)
MG ZS443 L
Nissan X-Trail575 L
Kerb weight
MG ZS1410 kg
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
| Spec | MG ZS | Nissan X-Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4430 mm✓ | 4680 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1818 mm✓ | 1840 mm |
| Height | 1635 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2610 mm | 2705 mm |
| Ground clearance | 168 mm | 205 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.1 m✓ | 11.2 m |
| Cargo (seats up) | 443 L | 575 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1457 L✓ | 1424 L |
| Kerb weight | 1410 kg✓ | 1631 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 37 L | 55 L✓ |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).