Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Nissan X-Trail is 105 mm longer than Mazda CX-5.
- • Nissan X-Trail is 106 kg heavier than Mazda CX-5.
- • Nissan X-Trail offers 133 L more boot space (seats up) than Mazda CX-5.
At a glance
Mazda CX-5Nissan X-Trail
Length
Mazda CX-54575 mm
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Cargo (seats up)
Mazda CX-5442 L
Nissan X-Trail575 L
Kerb weight
Mazda CX-51525 kg
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
| Spec | Mazda CX-5 | Nissan X-Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4575 mm✓ | 4680 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1845 mm | 1840 mm✓ |
| Height | 1680 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2700 mm | 2705 mm |
| Ground clearance | 193 mm | 205 mm |
| Turning circle | 11 m✓ | 11.2 m |
| Cargo (seats up) | 442 L | 575 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1342 L | 1424 L✓ |
| Kerb weight | 1525 kg✓ | 1631 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 58 L✓ | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).