Isuzu MU-X vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Isuzu MU-X is 170 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Isuzu MU-X is 564 kg heavier than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Nissan X-Trail offers 264 L more boot space (seats up) than Isuzu MU-X.
At a glance
Isuzu MU-XNissan X-Trail
Length
Isuzu MU-X4850 mm
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Cargo (seats up)
Isuzu MU-X311 L
Nissan X-Trail575 L
Kerb weight
Isuzu MU-X2195 kg
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
| Spec | Isuzu MU-X | Nissan X-Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4850 mm | 4680 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1870 mm | 1840 mm✓ |
| Height | 1825 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2855 mm | 2705 mm |
| Ground clearance | 235 mm | 205 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.8 m | 11.2 m✓ |
| Cargo (seats up) | 311 L | 575 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1119 L | 1424 L✓ |
| Kerb weight | 2195 kg | 1631 kg✓ |
| Payload | 695 kg | — |
| Seating capacity | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 80 L✓ | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).