GWM Haval H6 vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Mitsubishi Triton is 637 mm longer than GWM Haval H6.
- • Mitsubishi Triton is 499 kg heavier than GWM Haval H6.
At a glance
GWM Haval H6Mitsubishi Triton
Length
GWM Haval H64683 mm
Mitsubishi Triton5320 mm
Kerb weight
GWM Haval H61665 kg
Mitsubishi Triton2164 kg
| Spec | GWM Haval H6 | Mitsubishi Triton |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4683 mm✓ | 5320 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1886 mm✓ | 1930 mm |
| Height | 1730 mm | 1795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2738 mm | 3130 mm |
| Ground clearance | 200 mm | 228 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | — |
| Cargo (seats up) | 600 L | — |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1485 L | — |
| Kerb weight | 1665 kg✓ | 2164 kg |
| Payload | — | 1036 kg |
| Towing (braked) | — | 3500 kg |
| Towing (unbraked) | — | 750 kg |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | — | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 61 L | 75 L✓ |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).