Ford Ranger vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Ford Ranger is 690 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Ford Ranger is 619 kg heavier than Nissan X-Trail.
- • Ford Ranger uses 0.2 L/100km less fuel than Nissan X-Trail.
At a glance
Ford RangerNissan X-Trail
Length
Ford Ranger5370 mm
Nissan X-Trail4680 mm
Kerb weight
Ford Ranger2250 kg
Nissan X-Trail1631 kg
| Spec | Ford Ranger | Nissan X-Trail |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5370 mm | 4680 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1918 mm | 1840 mm✓ |
| Height | 1884 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3270 mm | 2705 mm |
| Ground clearance | 234 mm | 205 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.9 m | 11.2 m✓ |
| Cargo (seats up) | — | 575 L |
| Cargo (seats folded) | — | 1424 L |
| Kerb weight | 2250 kg | 1631 kg✓ |
| Payload | 980 kg | — |
| Towing (braked) | 3500 kg | — |
| Towing (unbraked) | 750 kg | — |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 7.2 L/100km✓ | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel tank | 80 L✓ | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).