Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Outlander
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Ford Ranger is 660 mm longer than Mitsubishi Outlander.
- • Ford Ranger is 565 kg heavier than Mitsubishi Outlander.
At a glance
Ford RangerMitsubishi Outlander
Length
Ford Ranger5370 mm
Mitsubishi Outlander4710 mm
Kerb weight
Ford Ranger2250 kg
Mitsubishi Outlander1685 kg
| Spec | Ford Ranger | Mitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5370 mm | 4710 mm✓ |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1918 mm | 1862 mm✓ |
| Height | 1884 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3270 mm | 2706 mm |
| Ground clearance | 234 mm | 209 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.9 m | 10.6 m✓ |
| Cargo (seats up) | — | 478 L |
| Cargo (seats folded) | — | 1473 L |
| Kerb weight | 2250 kg | 1685 kg✓ |
| Payload | 980 kg | — |
| Towing (braked) | 3500 kg | — |
| Towing (unbraked) | 750 kg | — |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel economy (combined) | 7.2 L/100km | — |
| Fuel tank | 80 L✓ | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).