BYD Atto 3 vs Mitsubishi Outlander
Spec diff in Australia. No opinion. Just numbers.
Key differences
- • Mitsubishi Outlander is 255 mm longer than BYD Atto 3.
- • BYD Atto 3 is 65 kg heavier than Mitsubishi Outlander.
- • Mitsubishi Outlander offers 38 L more boot space (seats up) than BYD Atto 3.
At a glance
BYD Atto 3Mitsubishi Outlander
Length
BYD Atto 34455 mm
Mitsubishi Outlander4710 mm
Cargo (seats up)
BYD Atto 3440 L
Mitsubishi Outlander478 L
Kerb weight
BYD Atto 31750 kg
Mitsubishi Outlander1685 kg
| Spec | BYD Atto 3 | Mitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4455 mm✓ | 4710 mm |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 1875 mm | 1862 mm✓ |
| Height | 1615 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2720 mm | 2706 mm |
| Ground clearance | 175 mm | 209 mm |
| Turning circle | 11 m | 10.6 m✓ |
| Cargo (seats up) | 440 L | 478 L✓ |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 1340 L | 1473 L✓ |
| Kerb weight | 1750 kg | 1685 kg✓ |
| Seating capacity | 5 | 7 |
| Range (WLTP) | 420 km | — |
| AC charging (max) | 7 kW | — |
| DC charging peak | 88 kW | — |
| Fuel tank | — | 55 L |
✓ marks the trim with the conventional better number for that spec — smaller for length, width, weight, fuel use, turning circle and DC 10–80% time; larger for range, cargo, payload, towing, battery and charging speed. Rows like height, wheelbase, ground clearance and seating capacity are shown without a ✓ because the "better" direction depends on your use case (headroom vs garage fit, off-road clearance vs car-park access).